tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3188764845452746737.post1940241398246418937..comments2023-08-09T04:20:22.205-07:00Comments on deretour: Rue Asuza, LA ... d'où les préjugés anticatholiques?Hans Georg Lundahlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3188764845452746737.post-18620491502070756622010-12-11T07:16:55.357-08:002010-12-11T07:16:55.357-08:00Chapter II of Acts Confirms Catholic interpretatio...<a href="http://drbo.org/chapter/51002.htm" rel="nofollow">Chapter II of Acts</a> Confirms Catholic interpretation of Joel as opposed to "Pentecostal one". Not meaning Seamour saw that verse when he needed to and ignored it, but it is there in Acts.Hans-Georg Lundahlhttp://o-x.fr/0mzknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3188764845452746737.post-71067331665250324762010-07-03T01:33:49.669-07:002010-07-03T01:33:49.669-07:00Brève biographie de St François Xavier, Short biog...<a href="www.magnificat.ca/cal/fran/12-03.htm" rel="nofollow">Brève biographie de St François Xavier</a>, <a href="www.ewtn.com/library/mary/stxavier.htm" rel="nofollow">Short biography of St Francis Xavier</a>Hans Georg Lundahlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3188764845452746737.post-17379665654644611872010-06-30T07:06:09.359-07:002010-06-30T07:06:09.359-07:00Et probablement le gars que j'ai rencontré hie...Et probablement le gars que j'ai rencontré hier était un excommunicatus vitandus, je n'aurais pas du lui serrer la main.Hans Georg Lundahlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3188764845452746737.post-14641461166776490622010-06-30T07:04:11.184-07:002010-06-30T07:04:11.184-07:00Probablement Parham pendant sa période massonique ...Probablement Parham pendant sa période massonique a cru des niaiseries semblebles à ceux de <a href="http://www.scripturecatholic.com/freemasonry_qa.html#tradition-17" rel="nofollow">Åke Eldburg, que voici interpellé par John von Salza</a> (en anglais).Hans Georg Lundahlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01055583255516264955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3188764845452746737.post-25157005798054072652010-06-29T06:33:29.002-07:002010-06-29T06:33:29.002-07:00On pourrait alléguer que les Papes auraient donné ...On pourrait alléguer que les Papes auraient donné des ordres sécrets, mais en même temps c'est pas seulement une allégation, mais sûr qu'ils ont enseigné, comme St Thomas, on n'est pas obligé à obéir les supérieurs humains en toute chose, par exemple pas en péché (donc pas d'attaques sur civilistes paisibles):<br /><br /><i>I answer that, As stated above (A1,4), he who obeys is moved at the bidding of the person who commands him, by a certain necessity of justice, even as a natural thing is moved through the power of its mover by a natural necessity. That a natural thing be not moved by its mover, may happen in two ways. First, on account of a hindrance arising from the stronger power of some other mover; thus wood is not burnt by fire if a stronger force of water intervene. Secondly, through lack of order in the movable with regard to its mover, since, though it is subject to the latter's action in one respect, yet it is not subject thereto in every respect. Thus, a humor is sometimes subject to the action of heat, as regards being heated, but not as regards being dried up or consumed. On like manner there are two reasons, for which a subject may not be bound to obey his superior in all things. First on account of the command of a higher power. For as a gloss says on Romans 13:2, "They that resist [Vulgate: 'He that resisteth'] the power, resist the ordinance of God" (cf. St. Augustine, De Verb. Dom. viii). "If a commissioner issue an order, are you to comply, if it is contrary to the bidding of the proconsul? Again if the proconsul command one thing, and the emperor another, will you hesitate, to disregard the former and serve the latter? Therefore if the emperor commands one thing and God another, you must disregard the former and obey God." Secondly, a subject is not bound to obey his superior if the latter command him to do something wherein he is not subject to him. For Seneca says (De Beneficiis iii): "It is wrong to suppose that slavery falls upon the whole man: for the better part of him is excepted." His body is subjected and assigned to his master but his soul is his own. Consequently in matters touching the internal movement of the will man is not bound to obey his fellow-man, but God alone. <br /><br />Nevertheless man is bound to obey his fellow-man in things that have to be done externally by means of the body: and yet, since by nature all men are equal, he is not bound to obey another man in matters touching the nature of the body, for instance in those relating to the support of his body or the begetting of his children. Wherefore servants are not bound to obey their masters, nor children their parents, in the question of contracting marriage or of remaining in the state of virginity or the like. But in matters concerning the disposal of actions and human affairs, a subject is bound to obey his superior within the sphere of his authority; for instance a soldier must obey his general in matters relating to war, a servant his master in matters touching the execution of the duties of his service, a son his father in matters relating to the conduct of his life and the care of the household; and so forth.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://newadvent.org/summa/3104.htm#article5" rel="nofollow">ibid. Q 104, A 5</a>HGLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3188764845452746737.post-66315123675371368912010-06-29T06:28:33.542-07:002010-06-29T06:28:33.542-07:00Il y a vraiment une malhonnêteté intellectuelle vi...Il y a vraiment une malhonnêteté intellectuelle vis-à-vis l'Église Catholique dans les cercles qui aiment Jacques Molay ou autrement les templiers.<br /><br />Un homme qui avait déjà défendu les templiers m'avait dit aujourd'hui que les templiers agissaient sur l'ordre des Papes quand ils <i>"attaquaient les infidèles"</i> ... sans préciser que les Papes n'avaient pas ordonné les attaques aux civilistes, comme si c'était impossible de savoir quels étaient les directives des Papes.<br /><br /><i>I answer that, Among unbelievers there are some who have never received the faith, such as the heathens and the Jews: and these are by no means to be compelled to the faith, in order that they may believe, because to believe depends on the will: nevertheless they should be compelled by the faithful, if it be possible to do so, so that they do not hinder the faith, by their blasphemies, or by their evil persuasions, or even by their open persecutions. It is for this reason that Christ's faithful often wage war with unbelievers, not indeed for the purpose of forcing them to believe, because even if they were to conquer them, and take them prisoners, they should still leave them free to believe, if they will, but in order to prevent them from hindering the faith of Christ. <br /><br />On the other hand, there are unbelievers who at some time have accepted the faith, and professed it, such as heretics and all apostates: such should be submitted even to bodily compulsion, that they may fulfil what they have promised, and hold what they, at one time, received.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://newadvent.org/summa/3010.htm#article8" rel="nofollow">St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica (Newadvent, Online), II-II<br />Q 10 A 8</a><br /><br />Et plus précisement sur les croisés réligieux:<br /><br /><i>I answer that, As stated above (Article 2), a religious order may be established not only for the works of the contemplative life, but also for the works of the active life, in so far as they are concerned in helping our neighbor and in the service of God, but not in so far as they are directed to a worldly object. Now the occupation of soldiering may be directed to the assistance of our neighbor, not only as regards private individuals, but also as regards the defense of the whole commonwealth. Hence it is said of Judas Machabeus (1 Maccabees 3:2-3) that "he [Vulgate: 'they'] fought with cheerfulness the battle of Israel, and he got his people great honor." It can also be directed to the upkeep of divine worship, wherefore (1 Maccabees 3:21) Judas is stated to have said: "We will fight for our lives and our laws," and further on (1 Maccabees 13:3) Simon said: "You know what great battles I and my brethren, and the house of my father, have fought for the laws and the sanctuary." <br /><br />Hence a religious order may be fittingly established for soldiering, not indeed for any worldly purpose, but for the defense of divine worship and public safety, or also of the poor and oppressed, according to Psalm 81:4: "Rescue the poor, and deliver the needy out of the hand of the sinner."</i><br /><br /><a href="http://newadvent.org/summa/3188.htm#article3" rel="nofollow">ibid. Q 188, A 3</a><br /><br />La position morale de St Thomas d'Aquin correspond très bien à ce que l'Église disait à l'Époque, et le but n'inclut pas les attaques atroces aux civilistes que les croisés ont parfois perpétrés en quelques endroits.Hans-Georgnoreply@blogger.com