Its condemnation of abortion is good and recognised as such by both Catholics and Orthodox. But since quoting Church Fathers he is also condemning Contraception, though Catholics and Paleohimerites, but not Neohimerites recognise that.
I added three comments, of which he did not approve the second, the one most condemning of neohimerite "orthodoxy".
I quoted from post, from St Augustine quote:
that they procure poison to produce infertility, and when this is of no avail, they find one means or another to destroy the unborn and flush it from the mother's womb.
I noted: that "poison to procure infertility" corresponds to contraceptive pill, just as much as "one means or another to ... flush it from the mother's womb" corresponds to abortion pills or other means of abortion.
I noted furthermore, that if he was a neohimerite, he needed to tell his bishop that, I as a Papist knew it already from Pius XI (Casti Connubii) and from Paul VI (Dignitatis Humanae), as well as paleo-himerites already were told so by that bishop of Shanghai and San Francisco and by Fr Seraphim Rose.
This was left out. The quote from Saint John Chrysostom confirmed it, and therefore I added a comment that he DID approve:
St John the Gold Mouth: "Why do you sow where the field is eager to destroy the fruit? Where there are medicines of sterility?"
Contraception pills are precisely "medicines of sterility". Thank you again.
Which proves he had already seen and disapproved the other comment.
This means I am very suspicious of intent when two persons of Greek Orthodox Church - one probably excommunicate, since communist and atheist - greeted me this last week. Also of that OCF thing I received like an invitation in this guestbook spam from Chisinau:
Ort/Place: Meniappeaby, Cotonou
Datum: 2010-10-14 07:25:03
As could be seen from RIPE nr, the spammer was not in Cotonou but in Chisinau.